tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22951171.post4291076299266010222..comments2010-01-27T20:52:13.574Zswishfishhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05056045066645931539noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22951171.post-74292844345028605562010-01-27T20:52:13.574Z2010-01-27T20:52:13.574ZYup, attendance-wise it is miles off. There is nothing wrong with using the highest gross stat though: that is the one that we have used for years. Yes, films will get more expensive with time; yes, the 3D surcharge bumps it up. It has still taken about 2 BILLION dollars, though. That is a success by anyone's standards.swishfishhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05056045066645931539noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22951171.post-16014183852429799272010-01-27T17:02:42.388Z2010-01-27T17:02:42.388ZMost successful film of all time, but only in skewed terms: http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/01/avatar-ticket-sales-.htmlNev 360http://www.blogger.com/profile/09188351364871427642noreply@blogger.com